M

Mike Brucaj

Site Manager

1 Properties

43 Units

Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
Less than 0.01 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Mike Brucaj
Inwood
560 West 218 Street, Manhattan, NY 10034
43 Units 6 Floors
2.8(2)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 1 year ago
GREAT AT THE BEGINNING
Former Tenant
Pros:
GREAT AT THE BEGINNING BUT...
Cons:
THEY HAD AN OLDER LADY AS THE "SUPER" SHE DID NOTHING MOPED THE LOBBY EVERY FEW WEEKS. SHE HAD WEIRD PICS AND THINGS IN THE BASEMENT. THE BUILDING SLOWLY GOT A HUGE WATER BUG INFESTATION IT WAS HORRIBLE.
Over 1 year ago
Once a very good building
Former Tenant
Pros:
My unit is very big (and not just by NYC standards), the bathroom and kitchen were completely renovated and upgraded before I moved in.
Super is very nice and responsive.
Neighborhood is great - quiet residential area with an incredible park just steps away.
Cons:
I can hear EVERYTHING from my immediate neighbors. And NOT because I have very loud neighbors, but because of poor noise insulation and/or the way the building was constructed. I'm hearing just everyday activity very clearly through the walls & ceilings. I'm not exaggerating when I say I can hear their sneezes and their every step. I can also clearly hear the elevator motor and whenever the elevator door opens and shuts. A couple of years ago, the live-in super retired and it took months before they hired a new super (but one who is only at the building during regular business hours, and doesn't live in the building). During the time when the building was without a super, things deteriorated a bit. The new super is very nice and responsive but I feel like the building never fully recovered to the state it was in when we had a live-in super.