A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.45 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
13
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 26, 2021: section 27-2005 adm code provide ventilation in the kitchen located at apt b2, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 19, 2020: hmc adm code: � 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt b2, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Anna Smagacz
Ditmars-Steinway
23-20 41 Street, Queens, NY 11105
23 Units • 4 Floors
0(0)
Astoria
14-55 Broadway, Queens, NY 11106
14 Units • 4 Floors
3.9(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
4.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
Not “nice”, but decent
Former Tenant
Pros:
The rent is cheap, heat/hot water included (and works well), stairwell is cleaned on a semi-regular basis, exterminator visits the building monthly, and the super is extremely responsive and friendly.
Cons:
Kind of a run-down prewar building—some of the walls are sort of uneven, some walls in the stairwell are crumbling and need patching, bad seal on the kitchen sink, etc. Early on in living here a neighbor a few floors down had a really bad ceiling leak, but I’ve been lucky so far in my unit. I’ve only interacted with the property management company once and they were extremely unpleasant/hostile, but luckily I don’t need to speak with them often because we have a super, and the super is great.
Advice to owner:
A bit more maintenance on the stairwell/lobby would spruce up the place.
3.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good Enough if You Have Low Standards
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good light, good cost
Cons:
Mouse problem (fixed), bad pipes, uneven floors/walls