Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
4 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Feb 03, 2022: section 26-1103 admin. code: post and maintain a proper notice on wall of the entrance story in english and spanish on the availability of the agency?s housing information guide. a sample notice can be found at www.nyc.gov/hpd. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
15
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 18, 2023: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code and dept. rules and regulations. remove the encumbrance obstructing egress from fire escapes flower pot front of building fire balcony at fire escape, 2nd story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
6
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 03, 2023: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective window glass pane at upper and lower sash in the 3rd room from north at west located at apt 2r, 2nd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Luis Vasquez
/-73.946062,40.695304,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Bedford-Stuyvesant
123 Tompkins Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11206
6 Units • 4 Floors
2.8(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Owner is getting greedy
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors are awesome and kind and generally keto themselves.
Cons:
Not clean in the entrance
Some of the apartments are outdated
There’s been an electrical fire
Intercom system doesn’t work anymore
Some of the apartments are outdated
There’s been an electrical fire
Intercom system doesn’t work anymore
Advice to owner:
Stop being greedy
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
really shit landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
really sweet neighbors
Cons:
piece of shit landlord
we almost all died in a fire started by an electric box fire in the basement due to an incredulous amount of cheap wiring and shitty installation throughout.
we almost all died in a fire started by an electric box fire in the basement due to an incredulous amount of cheap wiring and shitty installation throughout.
Advice to owner:
learn how to be a decent landlord instead of always going the cheapest route. good luck in court