A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.25 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Feb 27, 2015: section 27-2005 adm code replace with new the broken or defective rubber gasket at refrigerator door in the kitchen located at apt 3d, 3rd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Feb 27, 2015: section 27-2026 adm code repair the leaky and/or defective faucets at bathtub in the bathroom located at apt 3d, 3rd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Isabel Negorn
Murray Hill
245 East 39 Street, Manhattan, NY 10016
20 Units • 5 Floors
2.6(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Avoid at all costs
Former Tenant
Pros:
Heat worked, maybe a little too well
Cons:
Owner responsiveness is pretty much nonexistent. Takes fees out of security deposit for infrastructure issues that are out of residents control. Old building, rats and roaches in basement and seen in units. Minimal security, lost packages all the time.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive!
3 stars
Over 3 years ago
Stay Away - Much better buildings out there
Former Tenant
Pros:
Only Cheap rent
Cons:
Intercom system is terrible, if you get a lot of packages or food deliveries it will be horrible for you. Management is non responsive. Very old building and apartments. Rats in basement and who knows where else.