N
Nasor Ahmed Wahab
Officer
•Shareholder
•2 Properties
•43 Units
•Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.09 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 02, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 15, 2020: section 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... approximately 15 sq ft at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 3f, 3rd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Nasor Ahmed Wahab
/-73.9148,40.871242,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Inwood
510 West 218 Street, Manhattan, NY 10034
41 Units • 5 Floors
2.8(2)
/-73.736673,40.667212,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Rosedale
138-34 241 Street, Queens, NY 11422
2 Units • 2 Floors
0(0)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Please Change Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Management is sexist, disrespectful and unresponsive. I lived here for a year and I was DYING for my lease to end. There are no cameras in the building, you get roaches EVERY.SINGLE.DAY and when you complain to management or the super, they tell you "not to complain" and to "not make problems".
I also never received my deposit even after helping them find a new tenant.
I also never received my deposit even after helping them find a new tenant.
Cons:
- Water bugs year round.
- All packages get stolen, even in your mailbox
- no cameras in the building
-Management changes the entrance locks without notice
-Management turns off the water with out notice
- All packages get stolen, even in your mailbox
- no cameras in the building
-Management changes the entrance locks without notice
-Management turns off the water with out notice
Advice to owner:
Find another career if you cant accommodate your tenants asking for basic needs.
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Unresponsive Landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
Spacious apartment, lots of light
Cons:
Had to mail rent in every month, landlord and super were difficult to get in touch with. Would not deal with pests and left us without a working fridge for 2 weeks.