A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 month ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
5.16 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
32
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 04, 2023: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling and south wall at basement
Show all
Hazardous
23
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 02, 2023: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... approximately 1square foot at recessed walls of tge window 1st from east at south in the bathroom located at apt 4a, 4th story, 1st apartment from north at east , section ''eastnoerth'' original violation 16069008 issued 30-jun-23 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
Show all
Immediately hazardous
7
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 04, 2023: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove device preventing door from being self-closing brick setted and obstructed entrance door to fire stairs 1st from east at south,east section, at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with 10-12 Zichron Noach Trust
Williamsburg
78 Ten Eyck Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206
10 Units • 4 Floors
3.4(2)
Williamsburg
123 North 4 Street, Brooklyn, NY 11249
2 Units • 2 Floors
0(0)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
terrible management, many historic and existing code violations
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location and space.
Cons:
The management company is absolutely atrocious. Entitled do-nothings who are clearly used to getting away with gross negligence. Both incompetent and malicious.
3.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Negotiate Hard
Former Tenant
Pros:
New building and the landlord could be flexible in the right circumstances. The landlord reduced my rent due to COVID when I told him of my situation.
Cons:
Negotiate hard with the landlord from the onset. They will take advantage of you if you don’t speak up and stand your ground. The building is alright to live as long as you play hardball with the landlord. That being said, if you run into issues, the landlord does empathize with you and is willing to work with you to find a solution. Overall, it wasn’t a bad experience. It would be better if the landlord responded quickly to service calls.
Advice to owner:
Respond quickly to service calls and have your own staff as opposed to contractors only.