K

212 Kingsbridge, LLC

Corporate Owner

Owner

Agent

2 Properties

101 Units

Evictions: 5
Litigation History: Yes
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.97 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
11
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 10, 2021: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all peeling paint surfaces in the bathroom , the 2nd room from east at north, the 4th room from east at south, the 4th room from east at north, the kitchen located at apt 1, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Hazardous
66
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 26, 2020: § 27-2005 adm code repair the roof so that it will not leak throughout ceiling and east wall at roof bulkhead at public hall, section ''south''
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
21
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 14, 2022: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective at building entrance door
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with 212 Kingsbridge, LLC
University Heights
212 West Kingsbridge Road, Manhattan, NY 10463
61 Units 6 Floors
1.7(1)
Inwood
181 Vermilyea Avenue, Manhattan, NY 10034
40 Units 5 Floors
1.8(1)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 3 years ago
Horrible
Former Tenant
Pros:
The cheap rent
Cons:
Mice, Roaches, loud neighbors.
Advice to owner:
Clean it up!
Over 3 years ago
Landlord is a scammer
Former Tenant
Pros:
I liked that it was close to the train and supermarkets.
Cons:
I hated that the super was always flirting when he comes to fix things and the landlord would lie that he didn’t receive rent so make sure you have proof of it!
Advice to owner:
Listen to your tenants and don’t scam them. Don’t double charge them and watch your super their supposed to be helping not flirting with us tenants making us feel uncomfortable I say us because I asked all my other neighbors and they feel the same way.