Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
Less than 0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Moshe Neiman
/-73.957162,40.686013,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Bedford-Stuyvesant
102 Quincy Street, Brooklyn, NY 11238
7 Units • 4 Floors
3.6(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
4.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great apartment, Terrible Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
I loved living here, the apartments are clean and modern. Good location.
Cons:
The management is negligent. Luckily the apts are in great condition bc the management is near impossible to get a hold of. My bathtub was broken the ENTIRE 2.5 years i lived there. They kept sending people to do "quick fixes" that didn't work. Then the last two months of living there, they sent someone who botched fixing it, so they had to cover the tiles in plastic wrap and tape. They didn't get it fixed the rest of my lease (2.5 months). So for 2.5 months i had an unusable bath and had to shower while the knobs etc surroundings were covered in plastic wrap. They also raised my rent by 1000+ and then pressured me to move out asap. They started trying to show my place the day after I got the letter about rent even though i still had 3 months on the lease. Last, they took almost all of my security deposit. a very frustrating experience.
Advice to owner:
Don’t raise rent and force tenants out, don't ignore tenants complaints
2.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Bad experience with Landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
New building, good location
Cons:
Management was terrible at communicating or responding to requests during my lease. They tried to arrange viewings at minimal notice and bring multiple people into the apartment in the height of the pandemic with no interest in safety protocols.
When I wrote to make building requests or ask that something broken in the building was fixed I was often ignored until I followed up and called multiple times.
When the building’s front door keypad was broken and there was no way to enter the building they took days to respond and fix it, meaning that tenants had to wedge the door open.
They now will not respond to my calls or emails about returning my security deposit over two months after my lease ended which is in breach of our lease agreement. They have raised no concerns about the condition of the apartment but simply will not respond to me. This was a lovely building to live in however the landlord / management negatively impacted the experience to such an extent I would recommend prospective tenants look elsewhere.
When I wrote to make building requests or ask that something broken in the building was fixed I was often ignored until I followed up and called multiple times.
When the building’s front door keypad was broken and there was no way to enter the building they took days to respond and fix it, meaning that tenants had to wedge the door open.
They now will not respond to my calls or emails about returning my security deposit over two months after my lease ended which is in breach of our lease agreement. They have raised no concerns about the condition of the apartment but simply will not respond to me. This was a lovely building to live in however the landlord / management negatively impacted the experience to such an extent I would recommend prospective tenants look elsewhere.
Advice to owner:
Answer tenants in a timely matter and be respectful to them by paying attention to their basic needs and requests for the building.
Don’t break the law and ignore previous tenants in an effort to avoid returning security deposits.
Don’t break the law and ignore previous tenants in an effort to avoid returning security deposits.